<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorting Out Capitalization Requirements And Bond Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theratingsdebate.com/sorting-out-capitalization-requirements-and-bond-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theratingsdebate.com/sorting-out-capitalization-requirements-and-bond-ratings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.theratingsdebate.com/sorting-out-capitalization-requirements-and-bond-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Battle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theratingsdebate.com/?p=491#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Cate - I agree with transparency and transferring back to investors the fiduciary duty they offloaded to the NRSROs. 

We DO need to protect the FDIC fund. One way is to re-impose Glass-Stiegel. I prefer a sliding capital scale:
If you are a $100mm bank, 8% capital.
If you want to be a $500mm bank, 10% capital.
If you are a $10B bank, 20% capital.
If you want to be a $1T bank, 50% capital.

Capital requirements should increase with risk to the insurance fund. But use some sliding scale that makes banks build reserves in the good times, and let them pick how big they want to be vs. the capital requirement. 

However. Securitization didnt cause the &quot;credit crisis&quot;;  leverage did. We should not allow any securitized asset from getting a government guarantee unless it meets strict (80/20, prooof of income) lending standards and the Trust agrees to electronic full disclosure at least annually (like munis).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cate &#8211; I agree with transparency and transferring back to investors the fiduciary duty they offloaded to the NRSROs. </p>
<p>We DO need to protect the FDIC fund. One way is to re-impose Glass-Stiegel. I prefer a sliding capital scale:<br />
If you are a $100mm bank, 8% capital.<br />
If you want to be a $500mm bank, 10% capital.<br />
If you are a $10B bank, 20% capital.<br />
If you want to be a $1T bank, 50% capital.</p>
<p>Capital requirements should increase with risk to the insurance fund. But use some sliding scale that makes banks build reserves in the good times, and let them pick how big they want to be vs. the capital requirement. </p>
<p>However. Securitization didnt cause the &#8220;credit crisis&#8221;;  leverage did. We should not allow any securitized asset from getting a government guarantee unless it meets strict (80/20, prooof of income) lending standards and the Trust agrees to electronic full disclosure at least annually (like munis).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cate Long</title>
		<link>http://www.theratingsdebate.com/sorting-out-capitalization-requirements-and-bond-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Cate Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theratingsdebate.com/?p=491#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Transparency is needed and require banks and all investors to do more due diligence in addition to using credit ratings.

Also restrict deposit taking banks from proprietary trading...

Securitization is the tough one... 

http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Securitization</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transparency is needed and require banks and all investors to do more due diligence in addition to using credit ratings.</p>
<p>Also restrict deposit taking banks from proprietary trading&#8230;</p>
<p>Securitization is the tough one&#8230; </p>
<p><a href="http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Securitization" rel="nofollow">http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Securitization</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

